Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

½É½Å Àå¾ÖÀÚÀÇ ±¸°­»óÅ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿ªÇÐÁ¶»ç

AN EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDY OF ORAL STATUS OF HANDICAPPED PERSONS

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 25±Ç 2È£ p.441 ~ 449
±è¼±¹Ì, ¾ç±ÔÈ£,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è¼±¹Ì (  ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
¾ç±ÔÈ£ (  ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇÐ

Abstract

°á·Ð
ÀúÀÚµéÀº Àå¾ÖÀÚ ±¸°­½ÇŸ¦ ÆľÇÇÏ°í ÀÌ¿Í ¿¬°üµÇ´Â ¿äÀεéÀ» Á¶»çÇϱâ À§ÇØ ±¤Áֽà ¼Ò
ÀçÀÇ Àå¾ÖÀÚ 5 Çб³¿Í Àå¾ÖÀÚ H º¸È£½Ã¼³¿¡ ¼ö¿ëµÈ Àå¾ÖÀÚ 6¼¼ºÎÅÍ 30¼¼±îÁöÀÇ ½É½ÅÀå¾ÖÀÚ
259¸í(³ú¼º¸¶ºñ 143¸í, Á¤½Å¹Ú¾à¾Æ 101¸í, ´Ù¿îÁõÈıº 15¸í)À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¹®Áø°ú ±¸°­°ËÁøÀ»
½ÃÇàÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. Á¶»ç´ë»óÀÇ ¿¬·Éº° À¯Ä¡¿ì½Ä°æÇèÀÚÀ²°ú 1ÀÎ Æò±Õ À¯Ä¡¿ì½Ä°æÇèÁö¼ö´Â Àü±¹ Á¤»óÀÎÀ»
´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÑ º¸°íÀÇ À¯Ä¡¿ì½Ä°æÇèÀÚÀ²°ú 1ÀÎ Æò±Õ À¯Ä¡¿ì½Ä°æÇèÁö¼ö¿¡ ºñÇØ ´õ Àû¾ú´Ù.
2. Á¶»ç´ë»óÀÇ ¿¬·Éº° ¿µ±¸Ä¡ ¿ì½Ä°æÇèÀÚÀ²°ú 1ÀÎ Æò±Õ ¿µ±¸Ä¡¿ì½Ä°æÇèÁö¼ö¸¦ »êÃâÇÏ¿´´Â
µ¥ ¿¬·É¿¡ µû¶ó Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀ» º¸¿´À¸¸ç Àü±¹ÀÇ Á¤»óÀÎÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÑ º¸°íÀÇ ¿µ±¸Ä¡ ¿ì
½Ä°æÇèÀÚÀ²°ú 1ÀÎ Æò±Õ ¿µ±¸Ä¡ ¿ì½Ä°æÇèÁö¼ö¿¡ ºñÇØ 20¼¼±îÁö´Â ºñ½ÁÇϰųª ´õ ³·¾Ò°í ±×
ÀÌÈķδ ´õ ³ô¾Ò´Ù.
3. 1ȸ ÀÌ»óÀÇ ÀÕ¼ÖÁúÀ» ÇÏ´Â Àå¾ÖÀÚ Áß ½º½º·Î ÀÕ¼ÖÁúÀ» ÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì´Â Á¤½Å¹Ú¾àÀÚ 74%,
´Ù¿î ÁõÈıº 69%, ³ú¼º¸¶ºñ 48%¼øÀ̾ú°í, ÇÏ·çÁß ÀÕ¼ÖÁú Ƚ¼ö´Â Á¤½Å¹Ú¾àÀÚ¿Í ´Ù¿î ÁõÈıº
¿¡¼­ ³ú¼º¸¶ºñ¿¡¼­º¸´Ù ¸¹°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, ¿¬·Éº° 1ÀÏ Æò±Õ ÀÕ¼ÖÁú Ƚ¼ö´Â ¿¬·É¿¡ µû¶ó Áõ°¡
ÇÏ´Â ¾ç»óÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. Àü±¹ÀÇ Á¤»óÀÎÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÑ º¸°íÀÇ ÀÕ¼ÖÁú Ƚ¼öºÎ´Ù ¾à°£ ¸¹¾Ò´Ù.
4. Á¶»ç ´ë»óÀÇ Ä¡Àº¿°Àº ³ú¼º¸¶ºñ 62%, ´Ù¿î ÁõÈıº 48%, Á¤½Å¹Ú¾àÀÚ 60%¼øÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ
´Ù. Ä¡Àº¿° À¯º´ÀÚÀ²Àº ³ªÀÌ¿¡ µû¶ó Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â ¾ç»óÀ» º¸¿´À¸¸ç, Àü±¹ÀÇ Á¤»óÀÎÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î
ÇÑ º¸°í¿¡ ºñÇØ »ó´çÈ÷ ³ô¾Ò´Ù.
5. Á¶»ç ´ë»óÀÇ Ä¡¾Æ ±âÇüÀº ´Ù¿î ÁõÈıº 15%, Á¤½Å ¹Ú¾àÀÚ 8.5%, ³ú¼º¸¶ºñ 4.9%·Î ³ªÅ¸
³µ´Ù.
º» Á¶»ç°á°ú ½É½Å Àå¾ÖÀÚÀÇ Ä¡¾Æ¿ì½ÄÁõÀº 20¼¼±îÁö´Â Á¤»óÀο¡ ºñÇØ ³·°Å³ª ºñ½ÁÇÏ°í ¿¬
·É¿¡ µû¶ó Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ƯÈ÷ Ä¡Àº¿°Àº Á¤»óÀο¡ ºñÇØ ¾ÆÁÖ ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç ÀÕ¼ÖÁúÀÇ ÁÖü³ª Ƚ¼ö
°¡ Ä¡¾Æ¿ì½ÄÁõ°ú Ä¡Àº¿°ÀÇ °³¼±¿¡´Â ¿µÇâÀÌ Àû¾î ±¸°­°Ç°­¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±³À°°ú Á¦µµ°¡ µÞ¹Þħ µÇ
¾î¾ß ÇÏ°Ú´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
For the purpose of knowing oral status of handicapped persons and surveying and
correlative factors, authors interviewed and inspected 59 persons(cerbral palsy 143,
mental retardation 101, Down¡¯s syndrome 15) from six year old in Kwangju. The
results were as follows.
1. The dmf rate and dft index of handicapped persons according to age were lower
than that of report of normal persons.
2. The DMF rate and DMFT index of handicapped persons increased with age and
were similar to or lower than that of report of normal persons by the age of twenty,
but were higher after that age. There was no signigicant difference between handicaps
in DMFT rate.
3. Percentage of toothbrushing by himself or herself was 74% in mental retardation,
69% in Dowm¡¯s syndrome, and 48% in cerebral palsy and the frequency of
toothbrushing per day of mental retardation, Down¡¯s syndrome was higher than that of
cerebral palsy. The frequency of toothbrushing per day increased with age. The number
of toothbrushing of handicapped persons was slightly higher than of report of normal
persons.
4. Prevalence of gingivitis was 62% incerebral palsy, 48% in Down¡¯syndrome and
60% inmental retardation. Prevalence of gingicitis increased with age, and was higher
than that of report of normal persons.
5. Percentage of tooth anomaly was 15% in Down¡¯s syndrome, 8.5% in mental
retardation and 4.9% in cerebral palsy.
In this study, dental caries of handicapped persons was similar to or lower than that
of normal persons and increased with age. The prevalence of gingivitis was much
higher in handicapped persons. Subject or frequency of toothbrushing had no influence
on the dental caries and gingivitis, education of oral health and system are needed.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI